NASA's Lunar Power Initiative: Advancing Nuclear Energy Solutions for Sustainable Moon Exploration
- get into nuclear
- Feb 7, 2024
- 2 min read
NASA is currently in the midst of a mission aimed at introducing nuclear power sources to the Moon. The objective is to establish a functional reactor on the lunar surface by the early 2030s. Plans for electricity generation have been in progress since 2022, according to space.com.

Implemented through the Fission Surface Power Project, this initiative by the space agency is geared towards generating clean and secure off-planet energy. The Artemis program, slated for a new mission later this year, is considered pivotal to the success of this endeavour.
Recent developments include three significant contract confirmations, with NASA and the US Department of Energy jointly offering a substantial $5 million incentive for innovative space travel ideas. These government initiatives could lead to a groundbreaking plan, adapting the lunar night on the Moon to autonomously provide abundant energy and resources, irrespective of solar influences.
Trudy Kortes, program director for technology demonstration missions at NASA, emphasised the technical challenges posed by the lunar night, making a nuclear reactor an essential and enabling option for sustained exploration and scientific efforts on the moon.
Lindsay Kaldon, Fission Surface Power project manager at NASA, expressed the need to process information from the three partners, Lockheed Martin, Westinghouse, and the joint venture IX (Intuitive Machines and X-Energy). They are tasked with developing a reactor by 2026, potentially influencing advancements in nuclear-powered spacecraft, such as the DRACO, expected within a few years.
Contracts were awarded to Rolls Royce North American Technologies, Brayton Energy, and General Electric to enhance power converters, a crucial component for sustaining nuclear power. The aim is to create a design capable of powering a continuous human presence on the moon's surface for at least 10 years.










Comments